Showing posts with label diabetes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diabetes. Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2015

What Is The Future Impact of Population Health Management?

"Awareness of a problem does not mean much, particularly when you have special interests and self-serving institutions in play.” - Nassim Nicholas Taleb

The term population health is how new medicine should be able to identify a population and predicting what their health needs may be via constant intervention to improve health in a better healthcare system environment. The idea is to produce a healthcare service which does not start and finish at the hospital door, although intertwines all aspects of community and primary care.

We utilize enterprise level platform systems within structured optimization services settings. From a non technical perspective these often presented as systems which is able to integrate data (weight maintenance, exercise regimes, etc.) from a variety of sources. These sources may be primary care, secondary care and even information gained from patient web portals  that the patient can enter remotely in order to create an observational study of the same variables over long periods of time to gather holistic patient record. We then apply the findings to algorithms to the record to identify those at risk of disease and subsequently alert the physician – rather like a very sophisticated early warning score which we all are familiar with. This approach required the necessity of a role as health coach within the optimization services setting – someone who is able to keep an eye on a patient’s EHR and help to make behavioral changes when the system shows that someone is going off track and is therefore at risk of representing to hospital.

We often utilize the records of weight, diet and exercise which the health coach able to tell from the weight readings by the home scales. Once they are automatically synced to the health record we track that the  patient was putting on weight. As the projected next level we apply the data to a model of chronic disease; asthma, cardiovascular disease, chronic pain, COPD, diabetes, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, and stroke. The data will help patients to feel more empowered about the management of their condition. Neurologists or clinical nurse specialists could use this tool to manage the patient’s condition from home, to treat relapses, or even more importantly to predict them, and therefore ensure early treatment with DMT/immunosuppressant and perhaps enrolment in appropriate clinical trials. 



Moving Forward Technology is necessary but changing behavior is really hard. We are where we are, and getting to where we must be will take time. Provider systems are designed to get the results they get under a heavy fee-for-service influence. Currently most providers are ill equipped to provide population-based care or manage risk. Health plan systems are designed to perform the tasks they do while fee-for-service has strongly powering them as well.  Core administrative systems and processes are ill equipped to support population-based care. Regulatory environment evolved from a policy point of view that ‘more-is-better’ and competition ‘is essential’ to reduce costs . Anti-trust barriers to physician integration such as Stark Law is an obstacle.

Positive program outcomes within population health technology

  • Acquire data from all sources (Medicaid Claims, EHR Clinical, etc.)
  • Bring insight to providers similar to dashboards
  • Develop and deploy predictive algorithms
  • Drive strategy for resource allocation and clinical program implementation
  • Collect Supporting Data
  • DHA provider outreach and care coordination
  • Deploy programs and services to providers and the communities
  • EMR training and support
  • Pre-diabetes/diabetes screenings
  • Maternal health initiatives (Parents as Teachers, Parent Educators)
  • Readmission prevention (Health Coaches)
  • Digitization of clinical records in the Delta


An Example of a Process Flow - Predictive algorithm for pre-term births:

  • Mine the Data 
    • Number of providers capture semi-annual or annual data.
  • Note the trend towards common clinical features 
    • Calculate weighting Apply regression model or machine learning.
  • Define the high-risk factors 
    • Maternal age Multiple pregnancies or short intervals between Anxiety or depression Smoking Race Vaginal infections High cholesterol Asthma Chronic and gestational diabetes.
  • Validate the algorithm 
    • Study subpopulation of pre-term births and trends.
  • Ascribe score to a patient 
    • For subsequent pre-term births Establish threshold for action/intervention.                                                                                              


Creating Shared Goals & Initiatives...

What we know is the initial key in order to make a greater impact on Population Health. Therefore we needed to segment our patients into key focused groups.  Also identify gaps in the care planning process rather than anecdotal case findings. Assess root cause to readmissions more timely. As the next step identify what we have such as: Pieces of internal data (demographic, clinical data, medication); historical Data; foundations for Transitions of Care, cross continuum collaboration.  Then we have to focus on where we need to go by starting with risk stratification. Continue with acknowledging method to track care processes in order to drive improvement around interdisciplinary team processes. Recognizing the value in data analytics, flags, workflow design, automation, and dashboards will improve provisioning of data for cross continuum care partners and enhance post hospital follow up. Finally how do we get therewhich must fundamentally change how care is delivered. We have to move from a primary focus on volume: Full census; busy MRI; booked OR; hips, knees, tests, procedures… We have to move to a greater emphasis on value: care that measures up to best systems on cost and quality metrics; patients who are engaged in their healthcare; providing the right care at the right time to the right patient.


At the end Population Health at its core is the merger of  financing and the delivery of healthcare. "Patient engagement" is a broad concept that combines patient activation with interventions designed to increase activation and promote positive patient behavior where EHRs are becoming commodity platforms. The winner will be the EHR vendor that provides the best platform for innovation – the most open and most extensible platform. 

Foundations for the Next Decade

As the main goal monitor and improve quality to measure and achieve quality targets; providers need the ability to integrate EBM, document processes, monitor and report on quality markers.

Coordinate care and engage patients to effectively decrease costs and keep patients well, clinical data must be fluid, usable and have consumer accountability. Since payor decisions will be made across large populations, providers must have the ability to generate population-level reports and analytics as accurately as possible.

EMR vendors must be able to understand how each provider is delivering care and manage the payment distribution to incent the correct outcomes. Unlocking the full potential of the digital age in health care will require access to an efficient use of the population management data. 


Also published @ http://hitconsultant.net/2015/08/21/what-is-the-future-impact-of-population-health-management/

Monday, June 25, 2012

How health literate would you say you are?

Health literacy is an individual's ability to read, understand and use healthcare information to make decisions and follow instructions for treatment. There are multiple definitions of health literacy, in part because health literacy involves both the context or setting in which health literacy demands are made (e.g., health care, media, Internet or fitness facility) and the skills that people bring to that situation. Studies reveal that up to half of patients cannot understand basic healthcare information. Low health literacy reduces the success of treatment and increases the risk of medical error. Various interventions, such as simplified information and illustrations, avoiding jargon, "teach back" methods and encouraging patients questions, have improved health behaviors in persons with low health literacy. Health literacy is of continued and increasing concern for health professionals, as it is a primary factor behind health disparities. The Healthy People 2020 initiative of the United States Department of Health and Human Services has included it as a pressing new topic, with objectives for addressing it in the decade to come.
The relationship between poor literacy skills and health status is now well recognized and better understood. Interest in this relationship has led to the emergence of the concept of health literacy. The concept has emerged from two different roots – in clinical care and in public health. This paper describes the two distinctive concepts that reflect health literacy, respectively, as a clinical “risk”, or a personal “asset”. In the former case a strong science is developing to support screening for poor literacy skills in clinical care and this is leading to a range of changes to clinical practice and organization. The conceptualization of health literacy as an asset has its roots in educational research into literacy, concepts of adult learning, and health promotion. The science to support this conceptualization is less well developed and is focused on the development of skills and capacities intended to enable people to exert greater control over their health and the factors that shape health.
Characteristics
There are many factors that determine the health literacy level of health education materials or other health interventions. Reading level, numeracy level, language barriers, cultural appropriateness, format and style, sentence structure, use of illustrations, interactiveness of intervention, and numerous other factors will affect how easily health information is understood and followed.
A study of 2,600 patients conducted in 1995 by two US hospitals found that between 26% and 60% of patients could not understand medication directions, a standard informed consent or basic health care materials.

History
The young and multidisciplinary field of health literacy emerged from two expert groups; physicians and other health providers and health educators, and Adult Basic Education (ABE) and English as a Second Language (ESL) practitioners. Physicians are a source of groundbreaking patient comprehension and compliance studies. Adult Basic Education / English for Speakers of Languages Other Than English (ABE/ESOL) specialists study and design interventions to help people develop reading, writing, and conversation skills and increasingly infuse curricula with health information to promote better health literacy. A range of approaches to adult education brings health literacy skills to people in traditional classroom settings, as well as where they work and live.
Biomedical approach
The biomedical approach to health literacy that became dominant (in the U.S.) during the 1980s and 1990s often depicted individuals as lacking, or “suffering” from, low health literacy, assumed that recipients are passive in their possession and reception of health literacy, and believed that models of literacy and health literacy are politically neutral and universally applicable. This approach is found lacking when placed in the context of broader ecological, critical, and cultural approaches to health. This approach has produced, and continues to reproduce, numerous cor-relational studies.
Where there are adequate levels of health literacy, that is where the population has sufficient knowledge and skills and where members of a community have the confidence to guide their own health, people are able to stay healthy, recover from illness and live with disease or disability.
McMurray states that health literacy is important in a community as it addresses health inequities, as those at the lower levels of health literacy are often the ones who live in lower socioeconomic communities. Being aware of information relevant to improving their health, or how to access health resources creates higher levels of disadvantage. For some people, a lack of education and health literacy that would flow from education prevents them from becoming empowered at any time in their lives.
A more robust view of health literacy includes the ability to understand scientific concepts, content, and health research; skills in spoken, written, and online communication; critical interpretation of mass media messages; navigating complex systems of health care and governance; and knowledge and use of community capital and resources, as well as using cultural and indigenous knowledge in health decision making . This view sees health literacy as a social determinant of health that offers a powerful opportunity to reduce inequities in health.
This perspective defines health literacy as the wide range of skills, and competencies that people develop over their lifetimes to seek out, comprehend, evaluate, and use health information and concepts to make informed choices, reduce health risks, and increase quality of life. While definitions vary in wording, they all fall within the conceptual framework offered in this definition.
Defining health literacy in that manner builds the foundation for a multidimensional model of health literacy built around four central domains:
  • fundamental literacy,
  • scientific literacy,
  • civic literacy, and
  • cultural literacy.

Patient Safety and Outcomes
According to an Institute of Medicine (2004) report, low health literacy negatively affects the treatment outcome and safety of care delivery. These patients have a higher risk of hospitalization and longer hospital stays, are less likely to comply with treatment, are more likely to make errors with medication, and are more ill when they seek medical care.
The mismatch between a clinician's level of communication and a patient's ability to understand can lead to medication errors and adverse medical outcomes. The lack of health literacy affects all segments of the population, although it is disproportionate in certain demographic groups, such as the elderly, ethnic minorities, recent immigrants and persons with low general literacy. Health literacy skills are not only a problem in the public. Health care professionals (doctors, nurses, public health workers) can also have poor health literacy skills, such as a reduced ability to clearly explain health issues to patients and the public.
Risk Identification
Identifying patients at risk due to low health literacy is productive. Health behaviors such as correct medication use, taking advantage of health screening and effective preventive measures such as exercise and smoking cessation improved when low literacy patients were given visual aids, easy readability brochures or videotapes. Several tests of health literacy have been developed to validate research studies, but a practical, three-minute assessment can be completed in a doctor's office. A recent review on health literacy in the Journal of the American Medical Association's "Rational Clinical Examination Series" showed that single-item questions can be useful. The simple inquiry, "How confident are you in filling out medical forms by yourself?" gives a likelihood ratio (LR) for limited literacy of 5.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-6.4) for an answer of "a little confident" or "not at all confident"; an LR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.3) for "somewhat confident"; and an LR of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.24-0.82) for "quite a bit" or "extremely confident."
Intervention
Once identified, low health literacy patients benefit from providing limited but clear information at each visit, avoidance of medical jargon, using illustrations of important concepts and confirming information by a "teach back" method. A program called "Ask Me 3"is designed to bring public and physician attention to this issue, by letting patients know that they should ask three questions each time they talk to a doctor, nurse, or pharmacist:
  • What is my main problem?
  • What do I need to do?
  • Why is it important for me to do this?

A public information program by the US Department of Health and Human Services encourages patients to improve healthcare quality and avoid errors by asking questions about health conditions and treatment.
Health Illiterate-Related Diabetes Prevalence in Vietnamese-American Populations
Diabetes is a rapidly growing health problem among immigrants—affecting approximately 10 percent of Asian-Americans. It is the fifth-leading cause of death in Asian-Americans between the ages of 45 and 64. In addition, type 2 diabetes is the most common form of the disease. Those who are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes have high levels of blood glucose because the body does not effectively respond to insulin. It is a lifelong disease with no known cure. Diabetes is a chronic, debilitating, and costly social burden—costing healthcare systems about $100 billion annually.
Diabetes disproportionately affects undeserved and ethnically diverse populations, such as Vietnamese-American communities. The relationship between the disease and health literacy level is in part because of an individual’s ability to read English, evaluate blood glucose levels, and communicate with medical professionals. Other studies also suggest lack in knowledge of diabetes symptoms and complications. According to an observational cross-sectional study conducted, many Vietnamese-American diabetic patients show signs of poor blood glucose control and adherence due to inadequate self-management knowledge and experience. Diabetes health literacy research is needed to fully understand the burden of the chronic disease in Vietnamese-American communities, with respect to language and culture, health literacy, and immigrant status. Ethnic minority groups and immigrant communities have less knowledge of health promoting behavior, face considerable obstacles to health services, and experience poor communication with medical professionals. According to a recent review, studies has supported an independent relationship between literacy and knowledge of diabetes management and glucose control, but its impact on patients has not been sufficiently described. With the demand of chronic disease self-management (e.g., diabetic diet, glucose monitoring, etc.), a call for cultural-specific patient education is needed to achieve the control of diabetes and its adverse health outcomes in low- to middle-income Vietnamese-American immigrant communities.
ow health literate would you say you are?
Due to the increasing influence of the internet for information-seeking and health information distribution purposes, eHealth literacy has become an important topic of research in recent years. The eHealth literacy model is also referred to as the Lily model, which incorporates the following literacies, each of which are instrumental to the overall understanding and measurement of eHealth literacy.
  • Basic or traditional literacy
  • Computer literacy
  • Information literacy
  • Media literacy
  • Science literacy
  • Health literacy

Integrating AI into Clinical Workflows

By Erdem Asma A CMIO's Strategic Assessment of Risks, Opportunities, and Implementation Imperatives for Provider Organizations   with Cl...