Here's an overview of the essential revenue cycle key performance indicators (KPIs) Discharged Not Final Billed (DNFB) and Discharged Not Final Coded (DNFC) —two metrics critical to maintaining cash flow and operational efficiency within healthcare organizations. It explains how effective monitoring and management of these indicators reduce billing delays can, support timely reimbursement, and improve coding accuracy. The content outlines recommended practices for baselining, analyzing, and monitoring DNFC data, while identifying common factors that influence performance such as systemconfiguration, workflow changes, and regulatory updates. Designed for Health Information Management (HIM) and RevenueCycle leaders, the article serves as a practical guide for sustaining KPI compliance and optimizing overall financial performance.
Executive Summary
Following is an overview of how the discharged not final billed (DNFB) and discharged not final coded (DNFC) KPIs play a key role in revenue management. Health Information Management applications provide the tools to manage this process with a focus on efficiency and productivity of an organization’s coding resources.
KPI Overview
Discharged not final billed (DNFB) is a summary of balances that have been discharged but have not yet been final billed to the payer. These balances can qualify for DNFB based on standard delays, bill holds, encounters not yet coded and claims that are at the scrubber but have not been submitted to the payer. Once balances are sent to the payer, the balances no longer qualify as DNFB. Actively managing DNFB includes routine reporting, in-depth analysis, and managing exceptions. Successful DNFB management optimizes outcomes, such as accounts receivable (A/R) and cash targets. The first step to managing DNFB is to manage DNFC.
Discharged but not yet final coded (DNFC) is one of many metrics used to measure an organization’s revenue cycle performance. It is a common measurement used by organizations to monitor charts that have been discharged but not yet final coded. While DNFC balance can vary greatly by organization and type of services provided, DNFC days are measurable across organizations. Industry best practice, based on common approach, is an average of 1.5 days or less in DNFC. Many factors can impact DNFC at an organization, including staffing changes, new software, regulatory changes, and process changes.
Baselining and Monitoring
Baselining
It is recommended provider organizations use an average of six months of data to ensure that a normalized trend is used to evaluate the metric. This will serve as your baseline. To do this, you can build to generate the DNFC report for the six-month period to extract this information. It is important to evaluate the data by facility, patient type, and medical service to understand any variances that might indicate an area needs improvement or is performing well.
For this KPI, we baseline the legacy system prior to your conversion. Ensure that the formula used in the legacy system to calculate the KPI is the same as those used in future design specifications. If it is different, determine how to compare this data.
Analyzing the Data
It is important to evaluate the data by facility, patient type, and medical service to understand any variances that might indicate an area needs improvement or is performing well.
Monitoring the KPI
The coding manager and medical records director should monitor DNFC. Further investigation of DNFC is focused on:
- High-dollar accounts waiting for coding
- Providers that have delinquent records
- Coding staff does not meet productivity standards
- Product lines and medical services that have numerous accounts waiting for coding
Impacting Factors
System Configuration: Implementing new software can impact DNFC. Planning needs to include how to mitigate the impact on DNFC.
Workflows: A change in workflow can have a positive or negative impact on DNFC depending on the change. Monitor DNFC closely when making workflow changes.
Content: Content updates (such as ICD-CM, CPT, HCPCS, and groupers) that are not timely or synchronized across the organization can negatively impact DNFC. Proper planning for the change, training, and close monitoring is critical to manage the impact this has on the organization.
Adoption: Staffing can impact the adoption of this KPI; for example, turnover of organization members, maternity leave, and other departmental changes can impact DNFC. Proper evaluation and execution of a plan can help mitigate the impact on DNFC.
Regulatory Requirements: Regulatory changes can impact DNFC. Proper planning for the change and close monitoring is critical to manage the impact on coding productivity.
Recommended Operational Practices
First, we establish process monitor and communicate updates. To mitigate the factors on DNFC, it's recommended that your organization establish a process for monitoring and communicating DNFC.
- Review DNFC daily.
- Evaluate the following areas to determine the root cause if the DNFC is above the recommended 1.5-day balance: Staffing changes. Workflow changes. Outside factors, such as physician documentation.
- Create a committee to evaluate and make recommendations as needed.
- Communicate results and changes to users.
Conclusion
Routing reporting, in-depth analysis, and managing exceptions are all key factors in actively and successfully managing DNFB at your organization. Successful DNFB management optimizes outcomes, such as A/R and cash targets. Recommended best practice keep an average of 1.5 days or less in DNFC to maintain the health of your revenue cycle.


