Is mindfulness the
new leadership imperative?
Just read this fascinating, brilliant HBR blog by Polly
LaBarre. It poses some pretty provocative questions and challenges the status
quo of leadership development today. While the whole article resonates, I
reacted with an especially loud "Yes!" to:
What if, instead of stuffing people with curricula, models,
and competencies, we focused on deepening their sense of purpose, expanding
their capability to navigate difficulty and complexity, and enriching their
emotional resilience? What if, instead of trying to fix people, we assumed that
they were already full of potential...
I applaud anytime organizations provide opportunities for
people to cultivate capacities for well-being in people which mindfulness
certainly does. I think the positive effects that occur in the person, as well
as in the relationships among co-workers can be furthered when changes are also
made to the "systems and processes" in creating the conditions for
mindfulness and well being.
I think bringing mindfulness into organizational life and
leadership should include attention to both changes in the "hearts and
minds" of people and the structures and processes in which they
participate. For me this would signal a shift from mindful leaders to mindful
leadership--leadership being embedded in the property of people working
together not just only in the traits and behaviors of individuals in position
of power and responsibility.
There are a number of barriers to mindful leadership in
organizations today, not the least of which is resistance to this esoteric
ideal. However, I suspect that one large obstacle to incorporating mindful
leadership into an organization's systems and processes is a lack of practical,
tactical tools or models, which leaders can follow. That is, even if an
organizational leader(s) did want to foster a culture of mindfulness, they
wouldn't know how to recruit others to this cause and develop their own
capacity in it
Published in HBR Blog
Network by Polly LaBarre 3:32 PM December 30, 2011
Organizations invest billions annually on a success
curriculum known as "leadership development," which ends up leaving
so much on the table. Training and development programs almost universally
focus factory-like on inputs and outputs — absorb curriculum, check a box;
learn a skill, advance a rung; submit to assessment, fix a problem. Likewise,
they leave too many people behind with an elite selection process that fast
tracks "hi-pos" and essentially discards the rest. And they leave
most people cold with flavor of the month remedies, off sites, immersions, and
excursions — which produce little more than a grim legacy of fat binders
gathering dust on shelves.
What if, instead of stuffing people with curricula, models,
and competencies, we focused on deepening their sense of purpose, expanding
their capability to navigate difficulty and complexity, and enriching their
emotional resilience? What if, instead of trying to fix people, we assumed that
they were already full of potential and created an environment that promoted
their long-term well-being?
In other words, what if cultivating a successful inner life
was front and center on the leadership agenda?
"If you want to transform an organization it's not about changing systems and processes so much as it's about changing the hearts and minds of people," says Weiss. "Mindfulness is one of the all-time most brilliant technologies for helping to alleviate human suffering and for bringing out our extraordinary potential as human beings."
Pierce and Weiss distilled a set of principles that form the basis of what became the "Personal Excellence Program" (PEP), now heading into its sixth year inside Genentech (Pierce left the company this fall after 11 years to join salesforce.com). Together, these pillars offer up a short course in unleashing human capability, resilience, compassion, and well-being (and they're unpacked in even more detail in Weiss and Pierce's entry).
1. Developing people is a process — not an event. "Development is all too often considered a one-time event," says Weiss. She and Pierce designed PEP as a ten-month-long journey that unfolds in three phases, with big group meetings, regular small group sessions, individual coaching, peer coaching, and structured solo practice.
2. People don't grow from the neck up. Too much training focuses on the the mind — it's about transferring content. "We talk about the head, the heart, and the body," says Weiss. In fact, they do more than talk about it — they enact it every day at the start of every meeting. The "3-center check in" is the gateway drug to mindfulness. As Weiss describes it: "You close your eyes for a moment and you notice, 'What am I thinking — what's happening in my head center,' then you notice, 'What am I feeling — what's happening in my heart center.' then, 'What am I feeling — what's happening in my body.' It's a way in which people start paying attention and practicing mindfulness without ever practicing meditation."
3. Put mindfulness at the center (but don't call it that!). Weiss and her team were careful to keep the language of specific belief systems and religions out of PEP. The program revolves around three phases: reflection on and selection of a specific quality or capacity you want to work on (patience, decisiveness, courage); three months of cultivating the capacity for self-observation; and the hard work of turning insight into deliberate, dedicated, daily practice.
4. It's hard to grow alone. "People grow best in community," says Weiss. "People don't grow as well just reading a book, getting an online training, or just taking in information. There's an exponential impact in having people grow and learn together." That's why the PEP "pod" (small 6-8 person group) is the main vehicle throughout the year.
5. Everybody deserves to grow. Pierce felt strongly that PEP should be available to people across the board — not just the usual "stars" — and that it should be voluntary. "The program is by application and not declaration," he says.
As PEP heads into its sixth year at Genentech, some 800 people have participated in the program. (Weiss added a graduate curriculum and a student training program to create "PEPtators" as few people want the journey to end.) The impact has been nothing short of transformative for individuals and organization alike. When Pierce took over the IT department in 2002, its employee satisfaction scores were at rock bottom; four years into the program, the department ranked second in the company and is now consistently ranked among the best places to work in IT In the world (even in the wake of Genentech's 2009 merger with Roche Group — always a turbulent and dispiriting experience).
Pierce attributes that to "the emotional intelligence of people and the capacity to change" developed in PEP. But don't take his word for it. The data-obsessed Pierce commissioned a third path impact report on PEP. It came in glowing: 10-20% increase in employee satisfaction, 50% increase in employee collaboration, conflict management, and communication; 12% increase in customer satisfaction; and nearly three times the normal business impact.
"Through PEP we have created a smarter, more agile, and more responsive organization," says Pierce. "The reduction of suffering, the capacity to deal with difficulties, the level of engagement — these things are very powerful and you can't call a meeting to get them or give people stock options and have them. These are skills and qualities you have to cultivate and practice."
So how's this for a new year's resolution for hard-charging leaders: turn every ringing, pinging, tweeting, and blinking thing off — especially your mind — and just breathe.
No comments:
Post a Comment